INTRODUCTION:

A few people I've had conversations with told me that I should put all my insights into a blog because they thought I was so amusing. I then decided it would "hit two birds with one stone": I could release any/all pent-up stale energy by 'channeling' it into creative writing, and in addition it's something people apparently find very entertaining, so, here it is:

Social 'conditioning'/'programming' is at best misleading, and mostly hypocritical, if not completely fucking delusional. And it's causing a lot of humanity frustration. So, after my personal journey and all the paradigm shifts, shifts in consciousness, and insights I've had, I'm going to express my humorous, somewhat-constructive, iconoclasm.

The 'Princess Complex'

I’m wondering when a large percentage of the women (of any age) in Los Angeles are going to realize that although their fathers might have called them “Princess” growing up, it’s not literal. Moreover, if you want to be treated like one, you don’t deserve to be with a “Holier-Than-Thou” attitude, because you’re not.

These women are usually the ones who deserve the least to be treated in such a way, and their even MORE ironically prominently ignorant on top of it. 

They want to be friends with other women who they PERCEIVE to be of their “standard”(in quotes because that’s what they LACK) and I see them condescend all the men.

Why do they think that everyone WANTS her?

I once heard a couple women saying that if a guy doesn’t “hit on” them within a couple moments, they start to think about if he’s perhaps gay or maybe married. Yeah, God forbid someone who happens to be a man would want to just be NICE.

Hey Princesses, did you ever see that movie with Scarlett Johanson called “He’s Just Not That Into You”?

BEAUTY IS EXTREMELY COMMON. Try standing an attractive woman next to some other attractive women and see if she doesn't start squirming and almost implode.

TO ANY GIRL/WOMAN WHO THINKS IT'S A NOVELTY FOR A GUY TO BE WITHIN 10 FEET OF HER BECAUSE SHE HAS A PRETTY FACE, I SAY:

Hey Honey, yes you...yes YOU...that's right, I'm talking to ***YOU***: how about…….SHOW ME YOUR HUSBAND, OR FIANCE, OR BOYFRIEND(though those titles don’t even mean anything- see Marriage Blog), AND ALL YOUR EX BOYFRIENDS….AND EVERY GUY YOU'VE HAD A "FLING" OR ONE NIGH STAND WITH....(and while you should NOT JUDGE them; women who have "flings" and One Night Stands have issues which are another story all together and therefore especially shouldn't be acting like Princesses).

YEAH…..THEN let’s see if I can resist smirking and laughing to myself.

Users: Gold Diggers and Opportunists

First up, let's define some terminologies:

An "Opportunist" is not necessarily all that extreme. It depends. An Opportunist is someone who may indeed have a good heart, or seem nice or whatever, but who's primary motivation is to get ahead in life....and this includes making use of any friends they can. They aren't necessarily pathetic or deceitful people, but they certainly have an agenda, and are USUALLY varyingly immature and not very wise.

Next, is the Gold-Digger. This is now indeed officially someone unrespectable.

A gold-digger is a woman(usually) who’s top priority is affluence and materialism through the vehicle of an intimate relationship. They want the man for his money, because money represents SECURITY and a ticket to manifesting desire. The irony? Security is a reference of MIND. Just because you FEEL safe DOESN’T mean you are, and just because you DON’T feel safe doesn’t mean you AREN’T. So.....

It’s not even the MONEY you want to spend; it’s the VIBRATION. Money is a symbol ingrained through years of social “programming” into the sub-conscious which WE attribute meaning and value to. So by attaching meaning to the MONEY, you block your self from actually harnessing the power of grasping the vibration FIRST HAND. Thereby, DEGRADING your self-esteem sub-consciously.

The money is appealing, sure, as it is to everyone, but to the EXTENT, the DEGREE, she is willing to sell her Soul for it, tragically shows that she is confined to the consciousness of her psychology and biology- both aspects of the Lower Self, or Animal Self. And, especially if she’s not Self-Realized, or Soul-Conscious, then she’s not going to know any better anyway, which is even more ironic and she’s really up Shit Creek :/

A woman, as a human being, contains a spiritual dimension because she is a Soul. And as such, she is a CO-CREATOR of her OWN reality. She has the ability to infuse creative energy into the physical dimension to co-create the reality that her Soul wants. So then, on one layer, if she's an Opportunist, then she's immediately sub-communicating her unconscious identification with EGO. How IRONIC! So, the exact aspect of her which is the anti-thesis of her True Self, her actual Soul, is "running the show"! In other words, the one theme in her life which she's attempting to make her priority- i.e., her happiness- is now GUARANTEED to be OBSTRUCTED.

THE PRECISE ELEMENT (authority as a divine being and therefore a co-creator) WHICH COULD INDEED ALLOW HER TO ACCESS HER HIGHEST POTENTIAL WITH A FULFILLING INTIMATE RELATIONSHIP AND LIFE IS BEING CRIPPLED. How frighteningly depressing.

So, the woman is essentially really just riding on the guy's karmic(vibrational) frequency on the vibration of "money", rather than have the wisdom and self-empowerment as a Divine Being and Co-Creator of her own reality to generate her OWN vibrational frequency with her OWN monetary and security benefits; thereby building her own self-reliance and subsequently, self-esteem. None of this can occur in the psyche, if she is a Golddigger or a hardcore Opportunist.

Wow, I don't know which is more pathetic and depressing: being an actual prostitute who's not in a monogomous relationship, or being an Opportunist/Golddigger who's sacrificing her true sexual and spiritual fulfillment to essentially be a "live-in" prostitute.

You should only choose to be with each other for a few reasons:

1) If you find him attractive; if he’s your “type” then great, though I know two couples who are Soul Mates who were actually not each other’s type. But if they ARE your type, then great.

2) If there’s an emotional connection, or ideally in the best case scenario it’s also a Soul-Conscious emotional connection which isn’t exactly the same if they’re atheists- though ultimately, if the woman IS Soul-Conscious, then she most likely wouldn’t even be an archetype as low as a “goldigger” in the first place.

3) If the sex is amazing or beyond, which it ultimately won’t be without Point 2 above.

As a person who's primary passion is in the arts, and therefore the entertainment industry, I have found myself in the presence of these types of women. Some men don't care and just want to take what they can get. I, however, have real standards, which means her looks aren't enough, and she needs to be Soul-Conscious and virtuous. So then, how can I tell if a woman is just putting on a brilliant performance and facade of a sincere and genuine character, or if she's an Opportunist with her head up her ass? Because I've taken Intuitive Development classes for years as a part of my own personal, non-professional journey, and the natural bi-product of such a journey allows me to be energetically in-tune, and so I can actually FEEL the vibrations she is unintentionally emitting from her energy field as they come towards my body and into my own energy field. These vibrational frequencies she is emitting contain her INTENTIONS and thoughts. Her voice is an audible vibration, so I'll feel it when she speaks. Or even if she's not speaking, her body is emitting these vibrations which I'll feel sentiently(psychically) anyway. So, the issue then is how I react. No point in get angry at someone for being ignorant. They simply need "waking up". Psychological studies have ascertained that this type of person, or anyone who's manipulating you, will have a few "textbook" statistical reactions:
1) they squirm or "freak out" and get uncomfortable because the manipulation tactics that have usually "worked" for them in  past are no longer effective, and as the secondary result, they will either: a) start to "back-pedal" and play the "poor-me" card, and just make it into a more unnecessarily complicated justification in a last resort attempt to avoid being "caught", or b) they'll just disconnect and avoid you because you've "fried their circuits" and they don't know how to handle their disempowered manipulative paradigm.

And based on what I said above: ...a common statistic, is for those who will be "caught-out" on what I've revealed so far, is to try to ironically manipulate their OWN energy to convince THEMSELVES they're sincere and have entirely pure motives, let alone convince anyone else- i.e., backwards-rationalizing their affection for the person they're "after". However, this tactic will do nothing except "fragment" her energy/ vibrations she's emitting even more. So PRECISELY by TRYING to CONTROL her energy, she's only creating FURTHER INCONGRUITY between her ego and the energy she's emitting.

Here's a fun little technique: your Solar-Plexus contains a vortex of energy(also traditionally termed, "chakra" in spiritual teachings/practices). One of the functions of this vortex is to be your "Psychic- Bullshit- Detector". So, next time you feel a sharp distinct stinging or twisting sensation at your mid-line, be aware that whoever your talking to is either, a) deliberately trying to fuck with you because they are evil and reprehensible, or b) they're perhaps no evil or reprehensible, but definitely not being honest with you.

Have fun with that one.

And finally, for any woman who's read this particular blog entry: if you don't believe you're a Soul, then you're REALLY fucked....and not in the way you want to be. Also, if you haven't been compelled by this blog entry, and are reticent to have the courage to look in the mirror admit to YOURSELF - let alone anyone else- that you need to wake up, then you're a very depressing and unappealing woman, and the older you get, the more all of this will come bubbling up from your unconscious until it consumes you with insecurity. Godspeed.

Marriage

MARRIAGE

I've had a few occasions where marriage has come up in conversations among people, and I say "Well, tell me....what is marriage?" Then they'll say "It's the loving union between two people". I reply "Um...no, that's what a relationship is. But what's MARRIAGE?" MARRIAGE IS AN ILLUSION. It doesn't mean anything and no one will prove anything special, sacred, or holy through marriage. Marriage is a ring and a piece of paper (certificate). THAT'S IT.  Your "wedding"(label) is strictly an event which the human mind has attributed it's own meaning to based on social conditioning. A man could show me his "wedding ring"(just a piece of jewelry with that label) and tell me about his "wife", or "girlfriend", "lover", ("woman who he loves and signed a piece of paper with").

 It's funny sometimes when I meet a couple, and they have this proud solid tone in their voice as they introduce you to their significant other, saying "...this MY WIFE", or "...this is MY HUSBAND" and I hear the subtle proud emphasis of their words on HUSBAND/WIFE...as if they think that by using such labels I suddenly see them as being in an exclusive transcendental force-field of matrimony. NOPE. You aren't any closer to your partner through marriage.

Your signed certificate is then sent to a legal office("legal" means government associated and governments are run by common mortals) where it gets filed away in a drawer by a clerk. And no, the clerk isn't Jesus either. The woman changes her last name(your name isn't you, it's a mental label. You are a Soul) to his. Marriage does not mean you've found The One(there are exceptions with psychic phenomena), it means you have enough FAITH to INTEND on being exclusive for the rest of your life. If you want to drop 200 grand in honor of a silver ring and piece of paper, go for it, provided you realize the two of you are no closer together because of it. Marriage(when its heartfelt and genuine rather than for finances and legality) is a

celebration of the love you have for each other.....but then would you not celebrate that everyday anyway? Does celebrating love really require thousands of dollars, a DJ, jazz band, and catering? No.  So, should you drop thousands of dollars on your wedding? Sure, why not? Have a ball. But just realize what your wedding/marriage really IS: A PIECE OF PAPER. PERIOD.

Acting

I was motivated to write this after witnessing a "double-negative" scenario. Firstly, the "extraordinary" extent to which the entertainment industry is not even so much as OVERLY glamorized as it is simply GLAMORIZED, PERIOD. It's one thing to portray Hollywood as something romanticized which it's not, BUT...what REALLY motivated me to write this were people's ATITTUDES. Having an acting career is one thing, but to take it as seriously as people do, along with the politics, the condescension, etc. That crossed the line, and so I stopped biting my tongue and finally voiced the following:

It should be noted however, that I don't necessarily judged actors strictly for being "actors", because I know that a person is not their job. You are not what you "do". In addition, there are some who haven't yet seen "acting" from the higher perspective that I'm discerning, as followings:

What the hell, is to be taken so SERIOUSLY, actors and actresses??  I mean, REALLY. You guys are doing fucking ENTERTAINMENT; there's nothing "serious" in entertainment. If this were the medieval era, you guys would be liked to the Court Jester for fucks sake. But note: of course there are acceptable circumstances to many situations- I know actors/actresses who are beautiful people. For the others, what was their motivation? Did they just THINK and convince themselves they were truly passionate? Or just in it for the glitz and glamour(even if unconsciously). And even still further; had they seen it from the following perspective in this blog: not getting "seduced" or hypnotized by it's perceived glamor and calling it a "craft" when it can, and most often IS, a cunning invitation to unintentionally dilute your integrity, dignity, and self-respect by supplementing it for the illusory/pschological label that it's a "craft" called "acting". I personally can find acting very stimulating, but only with my uncompromising standards and restrictions. If I don't like a line or an action, I won't fucking say it or do it. If I think the wardrobe is atrocious I'm not going to fucking wear it. Otherwise, for most actors/actresses- without a solid sense of Self and unwillingness to discard your comfort zone, who aren't grounded with INTEGRITY and still illusioned to perceive acting to be some glamorous 'craft'- I think acting may as well be one of the least respectable careers. When you become an actor, you're putting your mind and body through so much for fictitious purposes on film so that an audience can watch you while they eat popcorn. Without realizing it, you're essentially becoming a tool, a spineless puppet to a screenwriter's imagination(unless you have more 'veto-power' due to marketability)- that means whatever the screenwriter can conceive and type on the page is what you'll be bending over backwards for. How depressing. Way to throw your integrity and dignity out the window. You'd be more respectable to join law enforcement; that way at least you're putting your mind and body through abuse for society's protection rather than their entertainment. There's really even no such thing as acting; the only thing that gives it that illusory title is that you have a camera aimed at you. And just because you have a damn camera aimed at you, doesn't mean your in a Safe Zone or Force Field. You're really doing what you're doing in the scene, for the most part anyway. So Sanford Meisner is half valid: 'acting is the reality of doing', however, they aren't 'imaginary circumstances': that is a psychological and therefore illusory projection. They were imaginary

upon the screenwriter's conception, but entirely real during a scene. The way I see it, Acting is essentially just prostitution on 35 millimeter. Actually, the moment someone tells me they are an actor/actress, I immediately hit a Tipping Point: the potential to lose 50% interest and respect for them- with the remaining potential respect and interest depending on their integrity and wisdom; on what their insights and actions are regarding humanism, community outreach, and eco-friendly social reform particularly all in the context of the spiritual dimension. If they are at LEAST, EXTREMELY inclined and have an appetite for that second part(humanism and spirituality)- and that's only if their not completely immersed and already educated on the esoteric dimension- then I will have lost ALL interest and respect in anything to do with them and will immediately mentally dissociate with them. It's also humorous to think of two kids running around with toy guns pretending to be cops, and then I compare it to the irony of two adults with prop guns except unlike the kids, they're actually taking it SERIOUSLY, as a serious craft....because after all, they're "actors". I can say that an actor is talented, compliment them and praise them for their talent, and I can say that I'm extremely grateful for them because without them my art would be incomplete, but I cannot not say that I respect them vocationally for their self-sacrificial career unless they make uncompromising standards in a contract.
Funny though- I've done some acting in the past. People ask me if I'm an actor(because apparently I seem like one)- My reply is: Everyone is. Literally. The only difference is whether they get unconsciously tricked into reducing their integrity... and whether get a paycheck for it.

Corporate Ladder/Work

The belief system of the corporate ladder is misconstructed. I can't necessarily judge all industries, but I can generalize because the system is so prevalent. If a person starts an entry level position at a company, you obviously have the potential to move up the ranks and quite possibly might find yourself successful at the positions you get promoted to. The main issue lies in the moto "pay your dues". Particularly if the dues require a Modus Operandi that is significantly different than the other positions. Your "dues" are not strictly payed in the work environment- they are paid in LIFE....which can absoutely manifest in as "work dues", but not exclusively. If an employee was waiting for a promotion to the next position, I don't care if they had worked for me for 10 years already- if I feel someone else is a more capable option, I'll choose them over the previous person. And that's the way it should be. Also, if someone is damn good at what they do, that's not to say they'd be good at another role too. Ironically, many companies and executives globally fail to realize all this.

I'm going to reference someone who's a strong example of this...to say the LEAST. There is a renowned(at least in his industry) television director, Joe Pytka.  He's been dubbed the 'King of Cannes'(for winning so much in the film festival), and has had over 25 commercials air on the Super Bowl throughout the last few decades. He is notorious for his violent attitude and abusive remarks. He shouts at everyone, including at the clients themselves who are the ones who HIRE him. And, they keep distance and constantly come back again with MORE work for him. Every other television director "sucks up" to the advertising agencies and clients, and tolerates any and all snobbery. He "bites the hand that feeds him" every time, and they keep coming back. Now....WHY exactly?
Whenever that question is asked, everyone tends to have the same answer: "Because, he's Pytka. That's just how it works". And yet I ask, "Yes, but.....WHY is Joe Pytka, "Joe Pytka-Who-Gets-Away-With-Almost-Anything-and- has- Full-Control"? And the replies are relatively the same from various people:
1) "Because he's a bully, but a very talented bully....his stuff looks good."
2) "He's been doing it for decades and therefore now has a reputation that is "epic"."
3) "He's very economically helpful because he shoots 15 minutes of footage and therefore it's a short day."

Ok, so then is that to infer...
1) That there aren't other talented directors as capable as he is but who are actually dignified on-set? Secondly, This guy has done SOME of the most epic work I've seen on television; commercials and Public Service Announcements. And, he also has a LOT of very forgettable work.
2) That simply because a person has been doing something for many years that they're extremely good at it?
As if there aren't plenty of people out there who've been doing something for years and more capable at it then others, let alone with an abusive attitude?
3) That no other directors are able to be more economically-friendly and save time and footage? I myself shot a spec-spot for Starbucks. Guess what? The entire spot had 17 minutes of footage. Why? Because I didn't have controlling agency members breathing down my neck. And what's more, is that I'd treat them very respectfully while STILL saving everyone time/money. And MULTIPLE other directors would likely also film economically if they had the upper-hand.

But hold on. Don't just take it from me, take it from Pytka himself, who I've come across in printed and video interviews stating my exact points:

"I think I get more respect than I deserve because I've been around longer than I should have been."- Joe Pytka

Right you are, Pytka.

My question to brands and agencies now is, since having heard it straight from the very person you all revere creatively and economically, from the "horse's mouth", are you now willing to allow other artists/filmmakers to demonstrate that they may be just as capable/talented, but minus the abuse?

The moral of this rant is this: EXPERIENCE DOES NOT EQUATE TO CAPABILITY. Alternatively stated, having gray hair and a couple of wrinkles…does NOT….by ANY means ….WHATSOEVER….make a person more professional, capable, talented, or respectable, than someone 20-30 years younger WITHOUT ANY gray hair or wrinkles. PERIOD. Kay? Kay.

Sexuality

This one is facetiously-dedicated to all the white anglo saxon protestant (“WASPY”)- or just any ethnicity- who walk through life demonizing sex and assuming that EVERY MAN is the same and is presuming that if a guy is talking to a girl or woman, that he is a dirty sexual predator who wants only to get her clothes off and insensitively "fuck" her, and then dump her at the side of the road:

For generations, men had been socially “conditioned” to see courtship- love and sex- as something inaccurate.

Movies, television shows, stories, what other people told us, what our parents told us, all that “social programming,” seemed to suggest that men had to talk women into having sex. It almost made it seem as if sex for a woman was a CHORE she performed as a reward to give the man. Thereby, filling men’s minds with delusional limiting beliefs from the hypocrisy. 

Society teaches that sex is like some type of Disney show or Romeo and Juliet. 

As a person who is intrinsically a deep soul and a rare person, I was able to talk to a couple of young women trustingly about sexuality from the female perspective, and get honest answers from them. I have copied and pasted the excerpts of our conversation below.

And now we unveil the TRUTH beyond the Social “Conditioning” which the media/society, and the Disney and Hallmark Channel taught you all:

ME: So many guys are taught that dating and sex are like some kind of romance novel, and she should be courted like Juliet or something. I remember the time I once read in an article, that a ton of women were anonymously surveyed on the type of first-kiss they would fantasize about from a guy. The choices were a) short and very sweet, b) firmly shove me up against a wall and dominantly kiss me passionately and hard, or c) long, soft and romantic. ALL OF THE WOMEN SELECTED “B”. That gave me a HUGE surprise. It’s the opposite of what is taught in the world. Does that survey surprise you?

Emily, 27, laughs, “No. Women LIKE to be dominated. You’ll NEVER hear those words come out a woman’s mouth, unless she’s VERY confident with her sexuality.”

Alice, 25, nods in agreement.

ME: WOW! Such a powerful statement to come out a woman’s mouth! Okay, so that’s a concept. But can we get more specific with regards to physical expression? Like, I was under the impression that it’s all about making sweet love, like a sensual Don Juan approach. Isn’t that what women like?

EMILY: “It’s a mood thing. Sometimes we want sweet…sometimes we just wanna fuck”.

ALICE nods with a smirk, “It’s true…”

Bite THAT, Society.

ME: WOW. Alright then. That’s enlightening. But, those are in a sense just words. Can you specify and explain an example of that lingo in a literal sense? Because the semantics of women wanting “love-making” and to “just fuck”, can still be elusive on the practical level of mental grasp.

(This next statement from Emily is facetiously-dedicated to every person in society, who hastily glares at all the sensitive good guys in the world whenever they see you talking to a girl/woman, PRESUMING that he is a Dirty-Rotten-Boy-Trying-To-Get-In-Her-Pants while thinking “I know what ALL you Good-For-Nothing-Horny-Manipulative guys REALLY want”, when in fact their intention is to be FRIENDLY, or even if they ARE romantically interested, they have a WONDERFUL PURE HEART).

EMILY: “EVERY single girl is all for [sweet] sensual sex [love-making], but they also want you to be strong enough to toss them on the bed, flip them over, and fuck them so hard they forget their name”.

ME: But perhaps that's just the case for YOU in particular, and not necessarily for EVERY woman.

A: No. EVERY WOMAN ON THIS PLANET....not "wants", but CRAVES, two extremes and as often as possible: firstly, to be made sensual love to, and secondly, to get fucked really damn hard. True of EVERY WOMAN IN THE WORLD.

NATALIE, 21, who all men drool over whenever I’m out with her and looks like a model, comes from a wealthy and sheltering family, likes “rough” sex. She says, “I like it fast and hard”. 

Q: “I always thought that sex for women was all about the emotional connection…”

A: “That’s a bunch of crap. Women are JUST as much ‘animals’ as men”.

Me: And just as much divine. For every man with a sexual preference, there’s a woman with the same preference. So, we can state to the world that women do indeed like sex…

A: Like??? LOVE, LOVE, LOVE! They YEARN for amazing sex. Actually…they NEED sex, PERIOD- "amazing" is a just the huge bonus.

ME: Wow. They LOVE and YEARN and even NEED sex. Yet she won’t say this to the public of course because she doesn’t want to be judged right?

EMILY: Right. Exactly. Because then she gets called a ‘slut’.

ME: Okay, wow. It’s refreshing to hear an actual woman articulate all you just did like that! So you can confirm that women love sex. Anything you can add or elaborate on?

A: Oh my God, one more time: WOMEN. LOVE. SEX. I can’t pound that into your head enough times.

If most men knew the true sexual nature of women, they
would be terrified. That's right, terrified. They have fantasies about all kinds of crazy shit.  They
fantasize about sex with strangers. Women are just as horny as men.

They just can't express it for FEAR of being labeled a
slut.

Her only hope is to find a man, a
Masterful-Lover, who can bring that sexual animal out of
her, harness it, and give her a safe place to express
it.

Look at the book 50 Shades of Grey.
In the UK it was the best selling book of all time.  It
sold more copies than Harry Potter - more than 20
million copies.

And who's buying all these books?

Women of all ages. 
Teenage girls, stay at home moms, college co-eds.
 They're all getting aroused while turning the pages of
this book.
Walk through an airport and half the women you see will
have a copy.

It's crazy. 

AND THIS BOOK IS NOT A “ROMANCE NOVEL”. 

It's filled with graphic descriptions of dirty, kinky
bondage and domination sex. 

ME: So, humanity, next time a woman is beautifully honest about her sexuality- DON’T be fuck-tards and judge her.

There you have it, you dear HYPOCRITICAL fuck-tards demonizing what you ALL, in actuality, WANT. I’ve ‘let the cat out the bag’…. DEAL WITH IT.